Volume 10, Issue 3
Two-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Model for Droplet Impingement and Breakup in Low Density Ratio Liquids

Amit Gupta & Ranganathan Kumar

Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), pp. 767-784.

Published online: 2011-10

Preview Full PDF 98 632
Export citation
  • Abstract

A two-dimensional lattice Boltzmann model has been employed to simulate the impingement of a liquid drop on a dry surface. For a range of Weber number, Reynolds number and low density ratios, multiple phases leading to breakup have been obtained. An analytical solution for breakup as function of Reynolds and Weber number based on the conservation of energy is shown to match well with the simulations. At the moment breakup occurs, the spread diameter is maximum; it increases with Weber number and reaches an asymptotic value at a density ratio of 10. Droplet breakup is found to be more viable for the case when the wall is non-wetting or neutral as compared to a wetting surface. Upon breakup, the distance between the daughter droplets is much higher for the case with a non-wetting wall, which illustrates the role of the surface interactions in the outcome of the impact.

  • Keywords

  • AMS Subject Headings

  • Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

  • Email address
  • References
  • Hide All
    View All

  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • TXT
@Article{CiCP-10-767, author = {Amit Gupta and Ranganathan Kumar}, title = {Two-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Model for Droplet Impingement and Breakup in Low Density Ratio Liquids}, journal = {Communications in Computational Physics}, year = {2011}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {767--784}, abstract = {

A two-dimensional lattice Boltzmann model has been employed to simulate the impingement of a liquid drop on a dry surface. For a range of Weber number, Reynolds number and low density ratios, multiple phases leading to breakup have been obtained. An analytical solution for breakup as function of Reynolds and Weber number based on the conservation of energy is shown to match well with the simulations. At the moment breakup occurs, the spread diameter is maximum; it increases with Weber number and reaches an asymptotic value at a density ratio of 10. Droplet breakup is found to be more viable for the case when the wall is non-wetting or neutral as compared to a wetting surface. Upon breakup, the distance between the daughter droplets is much higher for the case with a non-wetting wall, which illustrates the role of the surface interactions in the outcome of the impact.

}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.221209.160910a}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/7460.html} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Two-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Model for Droplet Impingement and Breakup in Low Density Ratio Liquids AU - Amit Gupta & Ranganathan Kumar JO - Communications in Computational Physics VL - 3 SP - 767 EP - 784 PY - 2011 DA - 2011/10 SN - 10 DO - http://dor.org/10.4208/cicp.221209.160910a UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/cicp/7460.html KW - AB -

A two-dimensional lattice Boltzmann model has been employed to simulate the impingement of a liquid drop on a dry surface. For a range of Weber number, Reynolds number and low density ratios, multiple phases leading to breakup have been obtained. An analytical solution for breakup as function of Reynolds and Weber number based on the conservation of energy is shown to match well with the simulations. At the moment breakup occurs, the spread diameter is maximum; it increases with Weber number and reaches an asymptotic value at a density ratio of 10. Droplet breakup is found to be more viable for the case when the wall is non-wetting or neutral as compared to a wetting surface. Upon breakup, the distance between the daughter droplets is much higher for the case with a non-wetting wall, which illustrates the role of the surface interactions in the outcome of the impact.

Amit Gupta & Ranganathan Kumar. (1970). Two-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Model for Droplet Impingement and Breakup in Low Density Ratio Liquids. Communications in Computational Physics. 10 (3). 767-784. doi:10.4208/cicp.221209.160910a
Copy to clipboard
The citation has been copied to your clipboard