Volume 13, Issue 4
Effect of Flux Evaluation Methods on the Resolution and Robustness of the Two-Step Finite-Difference WENO Scheme

T. Kamiya, M. Asahara & T. Nonomura

Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl., 13 (2020), pp. 1068-1097.

Published online: 2020-06

Preview Purchase PDF 155 1177
Export citation
  • Abstract

The resolution and the robustness of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme and two-step finite-difference WENO (TSFDWENO) schemes are compared by strictly using the same flux evaluation method and smoothness indicators. TSFDWENO schemes are defined to include a family of weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS) and an alternative WENO scheme. Comparison results indicate that WCNS has a higher resolution than the WENO scheme, while the WENO scheme is more robust than WCNS. Additionally, various flux evaluation methods are combined with TSFDWENO schemes, and they are evaluated. Then, the effects of the flux evaluation methods on the resolution and robustness of the scheme are investigated, and the results show that the robustness and the resolution can be significantly altered by changing the flux evaluation method. This study reveals the advantage of being able to use various flux evaluation methods in the TSFDWENO scheme as well as the fair comparison of the WENO schemes and WCNS. On the other hand, these effects are marginalized when changing the interpolation and differencing method. Such knowledge can be important when selecting schemes for actual simulation and developing guidelines for scheme improvement.

  • Keywords

High-order scheme, resolution, robustness, flux evaluation, TSFDWENO scheme.

  • AMS Subject Headings

  • Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

  • Email address
  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • TXT
@Article{NMTMA-13-1068, author = {T. Kamiya , and M. Asahara , and T. Nonomura , }, title = {Effect of Flux Evaluation Methods on the Resolution and Robustness of the Two-Step Finite-Difference WENO Scheme}, journal = {Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications}, year = {2020}, volume = {13}, number = {4}, pages = {1068--1097}, abstract = {

The resolution and the robustness of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme and two-step finite-difference WENO (TSFDWENO) schemes are compared by strictly using the same flux evaluation method and smoothness indicators. TSFDWENO schemes are defined to include a family of weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS) and an alternative WENO scheme. Comparison results indicate that WCNS has a higher resolution than the WENO scheme, while the WENO scheme is more robust than WCNS. Additionally, various flux evaluation methods are combined with TSFDWENO schemes, and they are evaluated. Then, the effects of the flux evaluation methods on the resolution and robustness of the scheme are investigated, and the results show that the robustness and the resolution can be significantly altered by changing the flux evaluation method. This study reveals the advantage of being able to use various flux evaluation methods in the TSFDWENO scheme as well as the fair comparison of the WENO schemes and WCNS. On the other hand, these effects are marginalized when changing the interpolation and differencing method. Such knowledge can be important when selecting schemes for actual simulation and developing guidelines for scheme improvement.

}, issn = {2079-7338}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.OA-2019-0033}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/nmtma/16967.html} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Flux Evaluation Methods on the Resolution and Robustness of the Two-Step Finite-Difference WENO Scheme AU - T. Kamiya , AU - M. Asahara , AU - T. Nonomura , JO - Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications VL - 4 SP - 1068 EP - 1097 PY - 2020 DA - 2020/06 SN - 13 DO - http://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.OA-2019-0033 UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/nmtma/16967.html KW - High-order scheme, resolution, robustness, flux evaluation, TSFDWENO scheme. AB -

The resolution and the robustness of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme and two-step finite-difference WENO (TSFDWENO) schemes are compared by strictly using the same flux evaluation method and smoothness indicators. TSFDWENO schemes are defined to include a family of weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS) and an alternative WENO scheme. Comparison results indicate that WCNS has a higher resolution than the WENO scheme, while the WENO scheme is more robust than WCNS. Additionally, various flux evaluation methods are combined with TSFDWENO schemes, and they are evaluated. Then, the effects of the flux evaluation methods on the resolution and robustness of the scheme are investigated, and the results show that the robustness and the resolution can be significantly altered by changing the flux evaluation method. This study reveals the advantage of being able to use various flux evaluation methods in the TSFDWENO scheme as well as the fair comparison of the WENO schemes and WCNS. On the other hand, these effects are marginalized when changing the interpolation and differencing method. Such knowledge can be important when selecting schemes for actual simulation and developing guidelines for scheme improvement.

T. Kamiya, M. Asahara & T. Nonomura. (2020). Effect of Flux Evaluation Methods on the Resolution and Robustness of the Two-Step Finite-Difference WENO Scheme. Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications. 13 (4). 1068-1097. doi:10.4208/nmtma.OA-2019-0033
Copy to clipboard
The citation has been copied to your clipboard