- Journal Home
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this paper an explicit/implicit schemes for parabolic equations with discontinuous coefficients is analyzed. We show that the error of the solution in $L^∞$ norm and the error of the discrete flux in $L^2$ norm are in order $O(\tau + h^2)$ and $O(\tau + h^{\frac{3}{2}})$, respectively and the scheme is stable under some weaker conditions, while the difference scheme has the truncation error $O(1)$ at the neighboring points of the discontinuity of the coefficient. Numerical experiments, which are given for both linear and nonlinear problems, show that our theoretical estimates are optimal in some sense. The comparison with some classical scheme is presented.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/970.html} }In this paper an explicit/implicit schemes for parabolic equations with discontinuous coefficients is analyzed. We show that the error of the solution in $L^∞$ norm and the error of the discrete flux in $L^2$ norm are in order $O(\tau + h^2)$ and $O(\tau + h^{\frac{3}{2}})$, respectively and the scheme is stable under some weaker conditions, while the difference scheme has the truncation error $O(1)$ at the neighboring points of the discontinuity of the coefficient. Numerical experiments, which are given for both linear and nonlinear problems, show that our theoretical estimates are optimal in some sense. The comparison with some classical scheme is presented.